Sunday, March 27, 2011

What Happened on Sept. 11th 2001? From Darkness to Light

This year being the upcoming tenth anniversary of 9-11, I thought it important to look back at where we have been in order to ascertain where it is we might be going. On that note...

This is my story, in regards to 9-11. I completely believed the Official Govt. Conspiracy Theory (OGCT) from the Beginning. I was at that time aware of possible "blow-back" as it is termed by the CIA. And, knowing that for decades the U.S. had been committing some pretty questionable operations (of the clandestine variety) around the world; I did not find it hard to believe that 'terrorists' had taken out the WTC.

I of course thought it odd that the buildings came down, but I never really looked at the 'collapse' until 2009. This was due to many reasons, but mainly, the History Channel had aired a "reenactment" of the collapse that showed the Truss structure of the twin towers without the central core columns. In it, the design of the building was depicted as an 'H' shaped structure, stacked one top of another other for 110 floors. So I trusted that information, and did not have internet access at that time.

In 2006 a wonderful friend challenged me on the OGCT - and the History Channel (psyop) explanation was the one I gave... to her dismay. So, lacking an internet connection, I checked out a copy of D.R. Griffins book, and quickly realized that the whole deal was a scam. Finally, in 2009, money became available for a computer and a connection. Research began In Earnest.

From the beginning, things were not as they would seem. Alex Jones, and his rants, of course drew me in: Here was a guy who was angry, 'sick and tired of the lies', it seemed. Were the tides of the masses, nearly ready to awaken and demand accountability, and justice?

It only took a couple of months for Jones' armor to begin to crack... Why did he stay away from any story out of Palestine? And why so much anger at the 'no planes' crowd? I thought they made a good case, but the infighting among the 'truth' community seemed to detract more than anything else... Can't we all at least agree to look at the evidence?

Actually, no, that is the last thing 'they' want you to look at. They want you to Trust THE Experts, and pick a side and take up arms against the oppressors, whomever they may be- and vanquish the foe. It is an age old pattern, and it leads nowhere.(in circles) So what to do? Research, check the evidence, and work on oneself.(learning is growth) Including keeping an open mind- "a person who knows only their own side of an issue- knows little of that."

So, having served in the military, and having had some demolitions experience, and going with what I knew, and starting there... Enter: Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth- the main proponents of a controlled demolitions theory.

It seemed the only plausible explanation. Explosives rigged to drop the towers
into their own footprints, how else could it have happened? Right? But from the beginning, there were problems. Most notably, in my thinking, Where where the HUGE explosions which would be needed to blow out core columns at the lower levels? Sure, some explosions were heard, but NOTHING of the Size and Amplitude that would be consistent with a building demo.

Plus these were huge buildings, side by side, the planning involved would boggle the mind to have them fall into their footprint as they did; a picture perfect 'job'. Too perfect in fact, and where was the pile? It seems that hundreds of thousands of tons of steel and concrete (not to mention the contents of the buildings) were pulverized to dust.

Pyroclastic flow as I called it then. But there was one essential difference, that
is, if it was a pyroclastic flow, it should be hot, and people would be burned- but everyone was covered with cool, thick dust; dust that floated away like smoke, thick gray and black billows of it... but only small isolated fires were observed- what was going on???

Also among the fray I wondered why no one had as of yet taken any legal action. Well it turns out, someone did.

Enter Dr. Judy Wood :) who had stuck to the evidence and found a link to a strange new "frequency modulation /magnetic/ electrical phenomenon", dubbed 'the Hutchison effect'. She had also filed court documents in an official challenge to the NIST NCSTAR1 report calling it science fraud. Now you're talkin- why did it take months of research to find this person? why hadn't the truth crowd supported her case, and spread the word?

The answer, as insidious as it is, is that the 9-11 truth movement is a ruse, a culling of those who have seen through the OGCT and are looking for answers. As unbelievable as it might seem, when you really think about it, it makes sense that whomever possesses the technology to reduce two 110 story buildings to dust, and a pile less than 3 stories, would engineer a false 'truth' movement in order to control any opposition.

The link between the Hutchison effect and the effects seen at ground zero is undeniable to those with an open mind and the courage to take an unreserved unbiased look at the EVIDENCE. Even if you feel the science is above your head, it is easy to find the connection between John Hutchison and the Military Industrial complex.

John did many demonstrations for DoD folks. These are people who would not be spending their time as such, unless they had good reason. And they did. John was able to produce a variety of 'anomalous' effects using less than 1000 watts of power on most occasions. The effects can be seen in a number of youtube videos and have been confirmed as verifiable by Lockheed scientist Boyd Bushman, among many notable others.

From the photographic and video archives of ground zero, we see weird fires, fuming, 'jellification', and advanced deterioration of materials. Also from conducted forensic studies we see molecular dissociation, transmutation, and 'dustifying' down to the molecular level. There is also evidence of 'peeling' of solid metals, extreme rustification, fusion of dissimilar materials, and from both survivor testimonies, and overturned cars seen around The WTC site, there is evidence of levitation.

All these phenomenon documented at the WTC site, have been seen in the experiments of John Hutchison on a scaled down level. So, it would seem, that the black ops/secret projects section of the famed Military Industrial Complex has weaponized advanced "directed energy" technology that could conceivably be used for good. Wow.

Looking back, it is easy to see how A&E or AJ don't want to talk about any anomalous effects that do not advance their theory, (or any theory not properly sanitized for mass distribution) this is how the establishment works. It is also easy to see now, how all those formerly trusted 'alternate' media sources go just far enough outside the mainstream to make you think they are different, but rest assured, their news has been preapproved as well. Any real information that actually threatens to subvert the dominate paradigm, will be controlled by the gatekeepers through the many means of tested, tried and trued tactics such as: deny, obfuscate, confuse, and most importantly ignore the evidence that does not conform.

This is business as usual for NASA, and many of the military industrial contractors who work for them or for the machine that is DoD. Behavior of this type is endemic to the culture of secrecy and psyops that is standard operating procedure for a broad range of military, bureaucratic, and contractor types. Another major factor in all this must be the current 'information age' we find ourselves in. The sheer volume of word in print available lends itself to many 'layers' of protection and flat out dis-information. Everybody knows- "NASA~ Never A Straight Answer" & "NIST~ Not Into Straight Talk"

What Dr. Judy Wood's case has also made apparent, is that the courts are just as culpable in this fiasco. Justice has been reduced to an abstract ideal sitting gagged and bound in an old deserted storage closet in some federal court house :(

Anyone can read the NIST report NCSTAR1 and Dr. Wood's Request for Change and then see for them self how blatantly and arrogantly the bureaucracy lies in order to keep the facts hidden, and the interests protected; and then they just dismiss the case. Contrary to the law.

9-11 has been called a "Mega Ritual". "The largest, and most rapidly produced piece of Performance Art in the World." And, "The greatest work of Art that is possible in the whole Cosmos". It may or may not be one or all of those things, but first and foremost, it was a Psychological Operation on the People of the World , part of a Demonstration of Secret Advanced Technology, in plain sight. (A 'Proof of Concept') And they will keep using this technology until enough people become aware of it's effects and demand an end to it.
Who will you tell?

Saturday, March 12, 2011

The Psychological Operation Aspect of 9-11

These comments were selected and transcribed from an interview of Dr. Judy Wood and Mr. Jerry Leaphart on the Republic Broadcasting Network show - 'Spingola Speaks' with Deanna Spingola aired March 11, 2011. Some wording has been changed for clarity.

By Mr. Jerry Leaphart

The starting point for thinking about 911 is from the psychological operation aspect or the information operation aspect. That is an important starting point or frame of reference. The reason for that is, it is of course bedrock that there has never been an official determination that is either accurate or regarded as accurate, concerning what happened on 911.

That may well be the reason why you have to preface your show as you did, Deanna, concerning 911- that it is a subject about which everyone has firm beliefs; it generates strong disputes; and yet underneath it all, there is nothing that anyone can point to that was officially done, publically funded, that serves the purpose of explaining or providing documentation on what was done on that day.

That is consistent with the way psychological operations work. There is a generally held view that US military psychological operations cannot be preformed on citizens within our own shores, but must be conducted off-shore, or against foreign nationals or enemies of some sort, but those lines are totally blurred in the information age in which we currently operate in, and there is no way, based on the cloak of secrecy now being used, to differentiate between what is a psychological operation and what is factual.

Therein lies the key clue to what happened to us that day.

Now, in the context of 911, let us recall that military exercises were taking place that day. The objective of which included 'the hijacking of jetliners and the crashing of them into buildings'. So the fact that you have military exercises taking place that day, that had as the objective, that which 'happened' on 911 has to be considered in the context of a psychological operation as more than just a coincidence.

In addition, the 911 commission report ended up being disavowed both by the co-chair of the commission (Kean&Hamilton) in a book they wrote entitled "Without Precedent", as well as in book by the commission's general counsel "The Ground Truth" (by John Farmer), where the essence of what both of those books point out, is that the commission was not told the truth by governmental, military and other officials concerning what had occurred on 911.

One of the people who came into severe criticism for not telling the truth was General Larry Arnold. It was Gen. Arnold who had the command responsibility for some of the military exercises taking place that day. In a separate book "Touching History" by Lynn Spencer it is pointed out that Gen. Arnold was not privy to all that was to take place during the course of the 9/11 military exercises. The reason for that, is that such exercises are conducted on the basis of top secrecy and security clearance procedures that allow for the use of secret compartmentalized information. This means that you could theoretically carry out an operation of the scope of 911, with surprisingly few people knowing exactly what is to take place during the course of such operations.

Now the 9/11 commission was never able to determine how 9/11 was financed, and that is what they said, but what they did note and gloss over, was that certain investments decisions were made...'the short sales' etc... some of those earnings were never collected, for if they were, then they (the investor(s)) would have become known. So in all of this the keywords are psychological operations and security clearance, or top secrecy. Therein lie the means through which the events of 9/11 could have been carried out.

What I credit Dr. Wood for is having conducted probably the only publically available (through a governmental website) forensic determination of what happened on 9/11. You won't find it anywhere else because there just simply has not ever been a determination of what destroyed the WTC complex on 9/11, other than the work published at the [department of commerce] website by Dr. Wood.

Now this of course is detailed in Dr. Wood's book, where she describes the journey that she took; and the book is a textbook as well as a story where she details what destroyed the WTC, namely a form of directed energy weaponry.

One of the key contributions that Dr. Wood has been able to make is the link between specific military industrial complex contractors (companies) and 9/11. We know that Dr. Wood has always taken the position that before you can get involved in making claims or statements on who did 9/11, you must first determine what happened and who participated in what aspects of what happened. In assessing the work done by NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technologies), Dr. Wood determined that their report (NCSTAR1) was not just false, but that it had gone beyond that level and really amounted to deliberate science fraud.

The report was done by NIST and their contractors in a way that defined their task so as to exclude the investigation, let alone the analysis, and still less a determination, of what destroyed the twin towers. They halted their investigation literally just as the event of destruction was beginning to start. That is more or less exactly what they said to Dr. Wood when she inquired about it. After that, Dr. Wood determined that was fraud,and something needed to be done about it.

And it was fraud, and as it turns out, working hand in glove with NIST, and in the manner in which these public-private partnerships work, it might well be said, that the private contractors NIST hired, actually directed that project.

Two of the principle companies that directed that project are, Science Applications International Corp(SAIC)and Applied Research Associates(ARA). Those companies had more people assigned to the NIST project than any other contractors (defendants in Dr. Wood's case). Furthermore the individuals who worked for those companies (SAIC &ARA) were put in the principal roles within the group of contractors (that is to say, they directed the project). That is not to say the other companies that were also sued did not have a role, they did.

However, during the course of the litigation proceedings, we actually determined that some of the other defendants essentially did not know the extent of involvement in the development of directed energy weaponry, and of the involvement in psychological operations that SAIC and ARA actually have. Now therein lies an important connector, SAIC and ARA are not merely the companies that led the NIST project that did not determine what destroyed the twin towers. Rather and in addition, SAIC and ARA are companies whose principle areas of expertise are weaponry and psyops (directed energy weaponry in particular)...that is what they do.

So you essentially had companies whose employees include people who have top secrecy clearances, and include people who are specifically involved in the development of directed energy weaponry, and in the carrying out of psychological operations, leading a project to determine what destroyed the WTC by setting up parameters that told you anything but what destroyed the WTC.

In the absence of any official determination of what actually happened to the towers, all that any of us can do, is to refer to the forensic information that is available to us. Dr. Wood has done that, and certainly has shown that the WTC was destroyed by directed energy weaponry. That does not say exactly what type it was or what the serial #s are, and indeed such weapons are not well known; you can barely get official sources to admit they exist. Certainly among the legal papers filed, we did get admissions from those who know, that they do indeed exist. This is a part of the secrecy culture that the military industrial complex uses to be able to carry out secret projects, black ops, and cover stories. When you add to that intentional psychological operations, you have a prescription for one disaster after another of increasing scope and magnitude.

Rather than attacking one another (over differing opinions on 9/11) we must remember that there simply has not been an official determination as to what was done to us on 9/11. That remains shrouded in secrecy. We can call attention to the fact we are being kept in the dark through the use of top secret classification, cover-ups, false stories, and psychological operations.

Somewhere, there are people who can can more fully address the issue of who did 9/11. I refer here to whistle-blowers. Cases like Dr. Wood's depend on people who know something coming forward. Now obviously it is no easy task for people who have security clearances and who have been given access to secret information to part with it, because if they do so, at the very least they will lose their jobs. We understand it is no easy task to be a whistle-blower. But ultimately a very large piece of the puzzle in connection with 9/11, does depend on people who know something, finding a way (directly, indirectly) of letting the proper people in authority know what was done to us. It is in that way that the story of 9/11 will go to that next chapter... that is to say, the determination of who did it.

Dr. Judy Wood has done the first part, she has determined what happened. The next part will depend, by in large, on whistle-blowers emerging. Our own experience in handling Dr. Wood's case, is that we do have reason to believe that there are a lot of people who wanted to help us, who did what they could to help us. We had some very interesting exchanges with people who for good reason chose to remain anonymous, who did not want their names used, and we respect that. But no one who we encountered had a complete answer as to who did it, but we did receive a lot of encouragement to keep at it.

Saturday, March 5, 2011

What it Means to be an American

This gentleman has some powerful and moving words. He who feels it, knows it.

Terrorism is not about religious extremism. Terrorism is about fear and control. It is about concocting a 'bogeyman' to keep us fearful and compliant. Many, many folks have stood up in the face of oppression and tyranny in the past, so that we might live free. Are you going to be told what to believe?

I chose to place faith in humanity - each and every human being on this earth, rather than the institutions that label and segregate us. There are no 'illegal aliens' - we are all children of the earth.

May the Peace of Endlessness, which passes all understanding, be always with you.