The scientific method has been used for centuries by us human types to try to gain understanding and clarity in a complex environment. By formulating and proposing a theory, a person (even a scientist) can put their idea to the test and then decide whether or not the theory 'holds water'. The theory is proposed, and then tested for validity by experimentation and observation. The best theories enable us to make predictions, as a prediction shows a workable hypotheses.
Looking at modern astronomy, astrophysics and cosmology, we have heard over and over again how 'surprised' or 'baffled' our tax funded NASA (never a straight answer) scientists are whenever they conduct this or that experiment. How can this be? How can the best funded and largest space program on planet Earth (that we know of...) be consistently wrong or 'in the dark' when it comes to actual physical tests?
The answer is quite simple. NASA is asking the WRONG questions. They are testing bunk theories. I can say this because there are better theories out there. Wallace Thornhill, an astrophysicist from Australia, has now made and confirmed many predictions in our solar system, based on a new theory or 'model' known as the electric universe. Click on the 'Thunderbolts' link and then on 'predictions' to see the entire list.
Now, Let us go back to 1950, post WWII America. Many publications of popular science were running articles on anti-gravity tech and other possible technological breakthroughs. However, that all stopped in '58 or '59. This information was cited by Dr. Paul LaViolette in an interview. (I understand it to be true in terms of the culture I was raised in during the 1970's. Even then there were many echo's of this "wheel-less-tech wonder world" ie: the jetsons, starwars and many others.) Curiously, this is around the same time as the Roswell incident (58-9), that research became hushed and pop culture was left to it's 'fantasies' of free energy and anti-gravity.
Looking further into alternative energy sources, one will find that since the 1960's there has been a concerted effort to keep any feasible tech that could possibly compete with oil or coal -off the market. Two of the more pervasive tactics used are to buy the invention patent from the inventor, and then file that invention away. Or, if somebody tries to develop the tech on their own, they find themselves intimidated or they end up dead like Dr. Eugene Mallove. See- who killed the electric car?, and pentagon free energy cover up.
So, the U.S. government has been developing exotic technologies for over 60 years. And apparently they have found NOTHING of good use to the human race or they would have unveiled it to the public that funded all that research right? Time to wake up citizen. The pharmaceutical industry gets millions in research & development from us tax payers, and they DO NOT pass those benefits along to us. In fact, drugs are generally more expensive here than in Canada or Mexico.
At this point, the reader may ask, where is the proof of 'exotic' energy technology? Well, the proof is, as they say- right in your face! We have all seen pictures, and video of the complete and utter devastation of the twin towers on Sept. 11 2001. The official gov't theory says that two aluminum passenger jets caused fires that melted the internal steel structure of the buildings and caused a catastrophic collapse and destruction of the towers.
This explanation is beyond impossible. Jet fuel just does not burn hot enough to even melt steel. On other occasions, fires have RAGED in steel core buildings and not a one EVER collapsed. Except on Sept. 11th 2001, when 3 skyscrapers 'collapsed'.
The "Truth Movement" here in the US has put forth 'Thermite' as 'the explosive used to take down the towers' and as of today, this is the leading alternate theory. Unfortunately, this theory fails to account for the overall level of nearly COMPLETE devastation & dissolution found at the WTC site- and it fails to account for MANY of the oddities and abnormalities (field effects) seen in lower Manhattan.
Where can a concerned, intelligent citizen turn? Just like all the great detectives, we must turn to the evidence. The most complete investigation of actual evidence I have found on this subject is the work of Dr. Judy Wood. She is a "former professor of mechanical engineering with research interests in experimental stress analysis, structural mechanics, optical methods, deformation analysis, and the materials characterization of bio-materials and composite materials. She is a member of the Society for Experimental Mechanics (SEM), co-founded SEM’s Biological Systems and Materials Division, and has served on the SEM Composite Materials Technical Division". And she has definitely done her homework. The theory she has put forth is that an 'exotic, free-energy type device' destroyed the WTC complex.
Let's think about this. As I have posted in the past, the twin towers were reduced to fine powder and dust (for the most part). WTC buildings 3, 4, 5, and 6 were also Damaged to the point of having to be demolished (3 was massively Destroyed). Also destroyed -disappeared was the Greek Orthodox Church south of the WTC site, and the Bankers Trust which was damaged, repaired, and then demolished years later. Very strange. That makes a total of nine (9) buildings destroyed. If you still think that two planes did it, I have a bridge to sell you.
This leads us to field effects, and continuing molecular disassociation effects. All of which can be found in abundance in and around the WTC site. If you are not familiar, look up toasted cars, round window holes and longitudinal wave effects.
These are all signatures of some type of Hutchinson effect. It must also be mentioned that using the word 'collapse' to describe what happened to the twin towers is not at all accurate. The better way to describe what happened that day is disintegration or a rapid degradation of material.
Let me now say this as clearly as I can see it. The evidence shows use of an advanced 'exotic' technology weapon that turned steel, concrete, copper, porcelain and other such materials to dust. Dust so fine it mostly lifted and floated up into the atmosphere and blew away in the wind.
When doing a survey of the many 9-11 theories out there, I can say with confidence that Dr. Judy Wood's theory is the ONLY ONE that even comes close to explaining the events of Sept 11th. For example, the amount of explosives it would have taken to destroy so much, so completely, is far beyond the capabilities of conventional or even "super-nano" explosives. And as we know, when the evidence is used to eliminate possibilities, whatever is left, no matter how improbable, is the solution. The evidence does not lie.
So please take the time, look at all the hard facts and evidence presented at both Dr. Judy Wood's site and Check the Evidence and think for yourself. When one comes to realize the amount of energy that was harnessed and directed toward such devastating means, it is only a small step to realize that the same power could be utilized for good rather than ill. Do not allow yourself to be led by the fools gesticulating on the end of the puppet strings. Come to recognize the strings, and where they attach.